Bone Surgery3 February 2026·9 min read

Autologous Bone Grafts in Implantology: Mental Symphysis, Retromolar Area and Iliac Crest — Protocols, Morbidities and Indications

Source:International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Vol. 53 (2024)
Autologous Bone Grafts in Implantology: Mental Symphysis, Retromolar Area and Iliac Crest — Protocols, Morbidities and Indications

Autologous bone remains the only biomaterial combining osteoconduction, osteoinduction and osteogenesis. But the choice of donor site — intraoral (symphysis, retromolar) or extraoral (iliac crest, calvaria) — profoundly determines morbidity, available volume and surgical indications.

Despite the considerable growth of substitute biomaterials, autologous bone remains in 2024 the absolute gold standard in reconstructive bone surgery. The only biomaterial combining the three fundamental bone-forming properties — osteoconduction, osteoinduction and direct osteogenesis by its living bone-forming cells — it is irreplaceable in situations of large bone defects, significant vertical augmentation or maxillofacial reconstruction after resection. Knowledge of harvesting sites, their anatomy and associated morbidities is a fundamental surgical skill.

1. Symphyseal Harvesting: Intraoral Reference Site for Small to Medium Volumes

The mental symphysis is the intraoral reference harvesting site for moderate volumes (0.5 to 4 mL of cortical/cancellous bone). Symphyseal bone presents a thick dense cortical (2–4 mm) with a medullary cancellous component rich in bone-producing cells. Standard harvesting technique: vestibular mucosal incision 5 mm from attached gingiva in the parasymphyseal region (3-3), full-thickness mucoperiosteal flap with exposure of the vestibular symphyseal surface, graft delineation with spherical bur + oscillating saw (limits: 5 mm below apices, 5 mm from midline, 5 mm above inferior mandibular border), harvesting with bone chisel and osteotome. Main morbidities: mental nerve anaesthesia (temporary 4–12 weeks in 30–40% of cases, permanent in < 2%), post-operative pain (mean VAS D3: 4.2/10), chin profile modification (rare if limits respected), gingival recession adjacent to incisors (8–12%).

2. Retromolar Harvesting: Less Morbid Alternative for Small Volumes

The mandibular retromolar region (retromolar trigone, ascending ramus) provides more modest bone volumes (0.5 to 2 mL) but with significantly reduced morbidity. The bone here is predominantly cortical, dense, with osteoconductive healing. The main indication is GBR for small defects (1–3 teeth) not requiring a large block. Advantages: no mental nerve anaesthesia, anatomically isolated zone, direct access path. Limitations: low maximum volume, risk of lingual or inferior alveolar nerve injury if dissection is too posterior, difficult access in patients with limited mouth opening. The meta-analysis by Urban et al. (IJOMS 2024) compares the two intraoral sites: neurological complication rate 1.8% (retromolar) vs 7.2% (symphysis) — statistically significant difference (p = 0.018).

Harvesting siteAvailable volumeBone typeNeurological morbidityMain indications
Mental symphysis0.5–4 mLCortico-cancellous2–40% (temporary)Horizontal GBR, anterior augmentation
Retromolar (ramus)0.5–2 mLPredominantly cortical< 2%Small defects, socket filling
Anterior iliac crest15–40 mLAbundant cancellous< 5% (cutaneous nerve)Large vertical defects, total reconstruction
Posterior iliac crest40–80 mLCancellous +++< 3%Major maxillofacial surgery
Calvaria (parietal bone)5–20 mLCortical< 1%Craniofacial reconstruction, severe maxillary atrophy
Proximal tibia10–25 mLCancellous< 3%Day-surgery alternative to iliac harvesting

3. Iliac Crest: Reference Site for Large Volumes

The anterior superior iliac crest is the reference harvesting site when large bone volumes are needed (severe maxillary atrophy Cawood & Howell class VI, total arch reconstruction after resection). It provides abundant cancellous volume (15–40 mL per anterior harvest, up to 80 mL for posterior harvest) with high osteogenic potential thanks to rich bone marrow. The procedure is performed under general anaesthesia with two simultaneous surgical teams (maxillofacial + iliac harvesting). Morbidities: harvesting site pain persisting 3–6 weeks (main patient-reported limitation), transient limping 1–3 weeks, haematoma (5–8%), abdominal hernia (< 1%), lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury (meralgia paraesthetica, 2–5%).

4. Autologous Graft Management: Conservation and Biological Optimisation

  • Graft preservation between harvest and placement: sterile 0.9% saline at 4°C — maximum delay 20 minutes recommended (cell viability drops 15% per additional 10-minute increment)
  • Optimal mixing with bone substitute: autograft 20–30% + xenograft/allograft 70–80% = optimal volume/biology compromise for vertical augmentation cases > 5 mm (Urban et al., EAO Consensus 2023)
  • Cortical graft fragmentation: bone mill or bone scraper (Safescraper Twist®) to convert cortical blocks into shavings increasing cellular contact surface
  • Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) as supplement: Choukroun protocol (2700 rpm × 12 min) — addition of PRF membranes to bone mix for PDGF, TGF-β1 and IGF-1 release over 7–14 days (documented improvement of early vascularisation)
  • Block graft fixation: temporary titanium fixation screws (osteosynthesis screws 1.2–1.5 mm) — removed at 6–9 months during implant placement
  • Systematic membrane coverage: resorbable collagen membrane or non-resorbable e-PTFE depending on volume and access

Autologous grafting remains the gold standard in pre-implant surgery. Its reasoned combination with bone substitutes and membrane growth factors (PRF, BMP-2) optimises the ratio of volume obtained to morbidity imposed on the patient.

Urban IA et al., International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2024

Editorial note

This article is written for scientific and professional monitoring purposes. The studies cited are drawn from peer-reviewed publications. Infinity Aligner does not endorse the results of third-party studies and recommends that professionals consult the original publications for any clinical application.

Infinity Aligner — Scientific team

Technology watch & dental literature review

Integrate innovation into your practice

Join the Infinity Aligner network and access the most advanced digital tools for your patients.

Become a partner